dc.contributor.author | Yang, Pei-Hsin | en |
dc.contributor.author | Chao, Kuo-Li | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-09-12T09:19:59Z | |
dc.date.available | 2012-09-12T09:19:59Z | |
dc.date.created | Wednesday, August 1, 2012 | en |
dc.date.issued | 2012-9-12 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10755/243276 | |
dc.description.abstract | Abstract: Articles on pediatric behavioral scales were reviewed to elucidate usage of pain assessment tools in clinical practice. Methods: A literature search was performed in the MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, SODL, CEPS and master thesis databases for systematic reviews published from 2000 to 2011 using the following search terms: pain, child, children, childhood, systematic review, and instrument. A total of 112 articles were identified. 7 articles on child pain assessment instrument met the inclusion criteria. Results: Pediatric pain assessment scales can be either observational scales or self-reported measure. 20 articles on observational scales were identified. CHEOPS, FLACC, PPPM, COMFORT, POCIS scales were suggested to be used in hospitalized, post-operative, critical care, and burn patients. A total of 34 single-item self-report measures were found. The most often used scale for research purposes were Pieces of hurt tool, FPS, Oucher, Wong-Baker FACES pain score, and VAS. The scales mentioned above were reliable, effective, and can be utilized in different types of diseases. Conclusion: Pain is subjective. In order to accurately assess pain in pediatric population, behavioral scales, self-report measure, and physiologic indicators should be incorporated. In pediatric population pain could not be well expressed due to immature cognition. Self-report measure is not a reliable tool when used in patients less than 6-year-old. Pain will be assessed more accurately when self-report measure is utilized in combination with a reliable and effective behavioral observation scale. In the future, research should be directed to comparison of the physiologic indicators with observational scales vs self-report measure to validate the effectiveness of different scales. | en |
dc.format | Text-based Document | en |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.subject | Pain | en |
dc.subject | Children | en |
dc.subject | Instrument | en |
dc.title | Systematic Literature Review of Pediatric Pain Measures | en |
dc.type | Presentation | en |
dc.rights.holder | <p>
All rights reserved by the author(s) and/or publisher(s) listed in this item record unless relinquished in whole or part by a rights notation or a Creative Commons License present in this item record.
</p><p>
All permission requests should be directed accordingly and not to the Sigma Repository.
</p><p>
All submitting authors or publishers have affirmed that when using material in their work where they do not own copyright, they have obtained permission of the copyright holder prior to submission and the rights holder has been acknowledged as necessary.
</p> | |
dc.description.note | Items submitted to a conference/event were evaluated/peer-reviewed at the time of abstract submission to the event. No other peer-review was provided prior to submission to the Henderson Repository. | |
dc.type.category | Full-text | en |
dc.contributor.department | Non-member | en |
dc.author.details | Yang, Pei-Hsin, RN, BSN; Chao, Kuo-Li, RN, BSN | en |
dc.conference.name | 23rd International Nursing Research Congress | en |
dc.conference.host | Sigma Theta Tau International, the Honor Society of Nursing | en |
dc.conference.location | Brisbane, Australia | en |
dc.date.conferenceyear | 2012 | en_US |
dc.description.reviewtype | Abstract Review Only: Reviewed by Event Host | en |
dc.description.acquisition | Proxy-submission | en |