Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTerhaar, Mary F.en
dc.date.accessioned2012-09-12T09:22:18Z
dc.date.available2012-09-12T09:22:18Z
dc.date.createdMonday, July 30, 2012en
dc.date.issued2012-9-12
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10755/243439
dc.description.abstract<p><strong>Purpose:</strong> The nature of the work products accepted as evidence of scholarship by academic programs awarding practice doctorates is quite variable: that includes work products of DNP programs as well. Some require full dissertations in the model of PhD programs. Others require scholarly work in which students demonstrate mastery of the 14 essentials; and this work may involve data collection for research conducted by PhDs, collaboration in research conducted by faculty (Nykamp, et al, 2010), secondary analysis of extant data sets, scholarly papers, case studies (Mundinger, et al, 2009), or translation projects. Still others require supervised practice. Not all demand original scholarship. At Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing DNP students complete an original, evidence based, scholarly project designed to address a significant practice problem. The conduct of these projects demonstrates mastery of the curriculum and the DNP essentials. Dissemination contributes to the evidence base for practice. The purpose of this work was to adapt a tool to consistently evaluate quality of scholarship produced by DNP students (Shenhar &amp; Dvir, 2007).</p> <p><strong>Methods:</strong> 80 capstone projects were analyzed using an instrument developed for this purpose.</p> <p><strong>Results:</strong> Over 4 years, methods and designs have increased in complexity, statistical analysis has become more robust, innovations based on evidence have derived more directly of the evidence, and fitted more precisely to the problem.</p> <p><strong>Conclusion:</strong> Instrument scales require further refinement to assure sensitivity and discrimination of performance. Data are useful to drive curriculum refinement. Shenhar AJ, &amp; Dvir D, (2007). Reinventing Project Management: A diamond approach to successful growth and innovation. Harvard Business School Press. Boston, MA.</p>en
dc.formatText-based Documenten
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectDNP Scholarshipen
dc.subjectEvaluationen
dc.subjectToolen
dc.titleEvaluating scholarly work products of the DNPen
dc.typePresentationen
dc.rights.holder<p> All rights reserved by the author(s) and/or publisher(s) listed in this item record unless relinquished in whole or part by a rights notation or a Creative Commons License present in this item record. </p><p> All permission requests should be directed accordingly and not to the Sigma Repository. </p><p> All submitting authors or publishers have affirmed that when using material in their work where they do not own copyright, they have obtained permission of the copyright holder prior to submission and the rights holder has been acknowledged as necessary. </p>
dc.description.note<p>Items submitted to a conference/event were evaluated/peer-reviewed at the time of abstract submission to the event. No other peer-review was provided prior to submission to the Henderson Repository.</p>en
dc.type.categoryFull-texten
dc.evidence.levelN/Aen
dc.research.approachN/Aen
dc.contributor.departmentNu Beta at-Largeen
dc.author.detailsTerhaar, Mary, DNSc, RNen
dc.conference.name23rd International Nursing Research Congressen
dc.conference.hostSigma Theta Tau Internationalen
dc.conference.locationBrisbane, Australiaen
dc.date.conferenceyear2012
dc.description.reviewtypeAbstract Review Only: Reviewed by Event Hosten
dc.description.acquisitionProxy-submissionen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


Powered by KnowledgeArc