Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNg, Mi Funen
dc.contributor.authorChan, Helen Y. L.en
dc.contributor.authorLeung, Doris Y. P.en
dc.date.accessioned2014-11-17T13:51:25Z
dc.date.available2014-11-17T13:51:25Z
dc.date.issued2014-11-17
dc.identifierINRC14PST124
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10755/335394
dc.description<p>International Nursing Research Congress, 2014 Theme: Engaging Colleagues: Improving Global Health Outcomes. Held at the Hong Kong Convention and Exhibition Centre, Wanchai, Hong Kong</p>en
dc.description.abstract<p>Session presented on Saturday, July 26, 2014:</p> <p>Background: Advance Care Planning is a process of discussion about an individual's preferences for care in their anticipation of future deterioration. There are different formats and inconsistent approach in implementing Advance Care Planning to older people. The effectiveness of Advance Care Planning intervention will influence on the knowledge, behavior and well- being in older people.</p> <p>Method of review: Inclusion Criteria</p> <p>Types of participants: Older people who are age 60 or over, with or without chronic illness, no restriction on any disease groups and health status of participants.</p> <p>Types of interventions: Advance Care Planning (ACP) refers to a process of discussing on end of life care/determining/executing treatment directives/appointing a proxy decision maker, or a combination of both.</p> <p>Formats: Self-administered computerized program, self-administered form, video, individual or group interview, information' sharing sessions, decision making meeting, counseling, single or multiple sessions.</p> <p>Types of studies: Studies designed in randomized control trial (RCT) to evaluate the outcomes of ACP In absence of RCT, quasi-experimental studies will be included. Types of comparison: Comparison between usual care or practice (no ACP program) with the ACP intervention Comparison between two or more types of ACP-related interventions Comparison between different combinations of format of ACP-related interventions.</p> <p>Types of outcomes: 1. Knowledge: refer to the knowledge, understanding &amp; awareness related to ACP &amp; end of life care. Outcome measures client's knowledge in: ACP, advance directives, appoint proxy, knowledge of current &amp; future health state, associated management 2. Behavior: Refers to client's action taken after ACP Outcome measures: identify preference of care or proxy, documentation on their preferences for CPR, artificial nutrition, intravenous antibiotic etc.; appointment of proxy, health services utilization e.g. hospitalization, length of stay, clinic attendance, A &amp; E attendance 3. Well-being: Focus on client's psychological state after the intervention.</p> <p>Outcome measures: client's satisfaction, level of stress/anxiety, quality of life, communication or relationship with others (relatives &amp; health care providers). Studies published in English and Chinese will be searched by three steps approach. Selected eligible articles will be managed by RevMan. The result will be pooled in statistical meta-analysis. Subgroup analysis will be conduct when there are heterogeneity in terms of study design, participants etc. For findings which are statistically analysis inappropriate, narrative summary will be provided.</p>en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectOlder peopleen
dc.subjectAdvance Care Planningen
dc.titleEffects of advance care planning on knowledge, behavior and well being of older people: A systematic review protocolen
dc.typePresentationen
dc.rights.holder<p> All rights reserved by the author(s) and/or publisher(s) listed in this item record unless relinquished in whole or part by a rights notation or a Creative Commons License present in this item record. </p><p> All permission requests should be directed accordingly and not to the Sigma Repository. </p><p> All submitting authors or publishers have affirmed that when using material in their work where they do not own copyright, they have obtained permission of the copyright holder prior to submission and the rights holder has been acknowledged as necessary. </p>
dc.description.note<p>Items submitted to a conference/event were evaluated/peer-reviewed at the time of abstract submission to the event. No other peer-review was provided prior to submission to the Henderson Repository.</p>
dc.type.categoryFull-texten
dc.evidence.levelN/Aen
dc.research.approachN/Aen
dc.contributor.departmentNon-memberen
dc.author.detailsMi Fun Ng, RN, BN, MN; Helen Y. L. Chan, RN, PhD; Doris Y. P. Leung, BSc, MPhil, PhDen
dc.conference.name25th International Nursing Research Congressen
dc.conference.hostSigma Theta Tau Internationalen
dc.conference.locationHong Kongen
dc.date.conferenceyear2014
dc.description.reviewtypeAbstract Review Only: Reviewed by Event Hosten
dc.description.acquisitionProxy-submissionen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


Powered by KnowledgeArc