Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorChiu, Hsiao-Yeanen
dc.contributor.authorTsai, Pei-Shanen
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-13T11:14:38Z
dc.date.available2016-07-13T11:14:38Z
dc.date.issued2016-07-13
dc.date.issued2016-07-13
dc.identifierINRC16A11
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10755/616526
dc.description<p>Theme: Leading Global Research: Advancing Practice, Advocacy, and Policy</p>en
dc.description.abstract<p>Session presented on Thursday, July 21, 2016:</p> <p><strong>Background:</strong> Insomnia is a common complaint in the modern societies; however, it remains underdiagnosed and undertreated. Although screening tools including Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), Athens Insomnia Scale (AIS), and Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) are widely used for identifying insomnia, the diagnostic properties of have yet to be summarized in a systematic manner. Aim: The aim of the current study was to estimate and to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the ISI, AIS, and PSQI in identifying insomnia.</p> <p><strong>Method:</strong> We perform a systematic search in electronic databases including EMBASE, PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Chinese Electronic Periodic Services from their inception to until May 20, 2015.</p> <p><strong>Summary:</strong> Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratios (DOR) against a reference standard were calculated for each study. The revised Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies was used to assess the quality of each included study. All analyses were conducted using Stata 14.0, with midas and metandi user-written commands, SAS 9.0.2,with Proc Mixed module, and Review Manager 5.3. Random effects bivariate model was used for analyses.</p> <p><strong>Results:</strong> We included 19 studies with a total of 4693 participants in data analyses. The summary estimates for the ISI, AIS, and PSQI in identifying insomnia in the studies were as follows: 88% (95% confidence interval CI = 0.79+/-0.93), 91% (0.87+/-0.93) and 94% (0.86+/-0.98); specificity: 85% (0.68+/-0.94), 87% (0.68+/-0.95) and 76% (0.64+/-0.85); and DORs: 41.93 (8.77+/-200.33), 67.7 (23.4+/-196.1) and 53 (15.5+/-186.2), respectively. No significant difference was observed regarding the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and DORs among the ISI, AIS, and PSQI (all P &gt; 0.05).</p> <p><strong>Conclusions:</strong> The current evidence indicates that the ISI, AIS, and PSQI are comparable and useful instruments for identifying insomnia in terms of diagnostic properties. Moreover, after comparisons of the diagnostic properties, sleep domains and feasibility of the scales revealed that the AIS is the strongest and most appropriate among the three instruments.</p>en
dc.formatText-based Documenten
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectDiagnostic Meta Analysisen
dc.subjectInsomniaen
dc.subjectAccuracyen
dc.titleDiagnostic accuracy of insomnia screening tools: A meta-analysisen
dc.title.alternativeCircadian Disorders: Advancing the Science of Sleepen
dc.typePresentationen
dc.rights.holder<p> All rights reserved by the author(s) and/or publisher(s) listed in this item record unless relinquished in whole or part by a rights notation or a Creative Commons License present in this item record. </p><p> All permission requests should be directed accordingly and not to the Sigma Repository. </p><p> All submitting authors or publishers have affirmed that when using material in their work where they do not own copyright, they have obtained permission of the copyright holder prior to submission and the rights holder has been acknowledged as necessary. </p>en
dc.description.note<p>Items submitted to a conference/event were evaluated/peer-reviewed at the time of abstract submission to the event. No other peer-review was provided prior to submission to the Henderson Repository.</p>
dc.type.categoryFull-texten
dc.evidence.levelN/Aen
dc.research.approachN/Aen
dc.contributor.departmentLambda Beta at-Largeen
dc.author.detailsHsiao-Yean Chiu, RN; Pei-Shan Tsai, RN, BCIAen
dc.conference.name27th international Nursing Research Congressen
dc.conference.hostSigma Theta Tau Internationalen
dc.conference.locationCape Town, South Africaen
dc.date.conferenceyear2016
dc.description.reviewtypeAbstract Review Only: Reviewed by Event Hosten
dc.description.acquisitionProxy-submissionen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


Powered by KnowledgeArc